<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 732 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and granting the appellant a refund of Rs.3,35,156/- for unutilized Cenvat credit accumulated against export of services. The Tribunal clarified that advance payments received for export of services should be considered in the refund computation, and the appellant was entitled to the refund. The respondent department was directed to refund the amount within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:09:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 732 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and granting the appellant a refund of Rs.3,35,156/- for unutilized Cenvat credit accumulated against export of services. The Tribunal clarified that advance payments received for export of services should be considered in the refund computation, and the appellant was entitled to the refund. The respondent department was directed to refund the amount within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>