https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378282 The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority's decision, rejecting the appellant's claims for cum duty benefit and the argument against penalties on the executives. The evidence supported the conclusion of systematic undervaluation and evasion of Central Excise duty, justifying the penalties imposed. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the original order. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:08:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378282 The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority's decision, rejecting the appellant's claims for cum duty benefit and the argument against penalties on the executives. The evidence supported the conclusion of systematic undervaluation and evasion of Central Excise duty, justifying the penalties imposed. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the original order. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378282