<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 716 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378272</link>
    <description>An unstamped instrument containing an arbitration clause cannot be acted upon in a Section 11 proceeding until it is impounded and the statutory stamp duty and penalty, if any, are paid. Section 11(6A) limits judicial scrutiny to the existence of an arbitration agreement, but it does not displace the mandatory fiscal scheme of the Stamp Act. The court must harmonise Section 11(13) with stamp law by impounding the instrument, sending it for stamp adjudication, and then proceeding with the appointment request so that both revenue compliance and expeditious disposal are given effect. The appointment order was set aside and the matter remitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 716 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378272</link>
      <description>An unstamped instrument containing an arbitration clause cannot be acted upon in a Section 11 proceeding until it is impounded and the statutory stamp duty and penalty, if any, are paid. Section 11(6A) limits judicial scrutiny to the existence of an arbitration agreement, but it does not displace the mandatory fiscal scheme of the Stamp Act. The court must harmonise Section 11(13) with stamp law by impounding the instrument, sending it for stamp adjudication, and then proceeding with the appointment request so that both revenue compliance and expeditious disposal are given effect. The appointment order was set aside and the matter remitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>