https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378268 The Court quashed the Assessing Officer's order and issued an injunction against recovery proceedings until the appeal was resolved. The Court criticized the Assessing Officer for not considering relevant factors and failing to exercise discretion in granting the stay. The second respondent was directed to expedite the appeal process within three months. The decision was based on the need for a timely resolution and the failure of the Assessing Officer to exercise discretion. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, concluding the legal proceedings. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378268 The Court quashed the Assessing Officer's order and issued an injunction against recovery proceedings until the appeal was resolved. The Court criticized the Assessing Officer for not considering relevant factors and failing to exercise discretion in granting the stay. The second respondent was directed to expedite the appeal process within three months. The decision was based on the need for a timely resolution and the failure of the Assessing Officer to exercise discretion. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, concluding the legal proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378268