<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1863 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279938</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, as the notice issued by the Assessing Officer did not specify the grounds for initiating penalty proceedings, rendering the initiation unlawful. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing a Karnataka High Court decision, and deleted the penalty confirmed by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 20:36:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1863 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279938</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, as the notice issued by the Assessing Officer did not specify the grounds for initiating penalty proceedings, rendering the initiation unlawful. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing a Karnataka High Court decision, and deleted the penalty confirmed by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>