<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 84 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17661</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, holding that the deductions claimed for surtax against business income could not be allowed. The Court emphasized the debatable nature of the issue and cited legal precedents indicating that such deductions were not permissible. The decision favored the Revenue, concluding that the error in question did not qualify as a mistake apparent on the face of the record, as it involved complex legal points and lacked definitive higher court rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:28:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 84 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17661</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, holding that the deductions claimed for surtax against business income could not be allowed. The Court emphasized the debatable nature of the issue and cited legal precedents indicating that such deductions were not permissible. The decision favored the Revenue, concluding that the error in question did not qualify as a mistake apparent on the face of the record, as it involved complex legal points and lacked definitive higher court rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>