<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 593 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279930</link>
    <description>Information that on its face disclosed corruption allegations against a public servant was sufficient to create reasonable suspicion of a cognizable offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and to set the investigative machinery in motion. A first information report need not contain every ingredient of the offence or full particulars at the threshold; once cognizable offence is disclosed, police may investigate under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Questions about strict compliance with search and seizure procedure, or whether a later formal report was the operative FIR, were not grounds to quash the investigation at that stage. The High Court&#039;s quashing order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 593 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279930</link>
      <description>Information that on its face disclosed corruption allegations against a public servant was sufficient to create reasonable suspicion of a cognizable offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and to set the investigative machinery in motion. A first information report need not contain every ingredient of the offence or full particulars at the threshold; once cognizable offence is disclosed, police may investigate under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Questions about strict compliance with search and seizure procedure, or whether a later formal report was the operative FIR, were not grounds to quash the investigation at that stage. The High Court&#039;s quashing order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>