<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 60 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17656</link>
    <description>Sale consideration diverted directly to the mortgagee under an overriding title was not received by the transferor, so the transferor was not chargeable to capital gains on those facts. The property was subject to an enforceable mortgage in favour of the Kerala Financial Corporation, which had the right to sell the property and apply the proceeds towards the loan. Because the entire consideration went to discharge the mortgage debt and the assessee received nothing, the ingredients of chargeability under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were not satisfied and section 48 computation did not arise on the Revenue&#039;s footing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:17:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 60 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17656</link>
      <description>Sale consideration diverted directly to the mortgagee under an overriding title was not received by the transferor, so the transferor was not chargeable to capital gains on those facts. The property was subject to an enforceable mortgage in favour of the Kerala Financial Corporation, which had the right to sell the property and apply the proceeds towards the loan. Because the entire consideration went to discharge the mortgage debt and the assessee received nothing, the ingredients of chargeability under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were not satisfied and section 48 computation did not arise on the Revenue&#039;s footing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>