<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 673 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378229</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, revoking the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the assessee providing substantial evidence to support purchases, including invoices, bank statements, export documents, and supplier confirmations. The Tribunal emphasized that the addition should be specific and based on unverifiable purchases to justify such a penalty, ultimately finding no merit in upholding it in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:15:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 673 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378229</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, revoking the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the assessee providing substantial evidence to support purchases, including invoices, bank statements, export documents, and supplier confirmations. The Tribunal emphasized that the addition should be specific and based on unverifiable purchases to justify such a penalty, ultimately finding no merit in upholding it in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>