<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 655 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378211</link>
    <description>The Tribunal should not dispose of an appeal without deciding the dispute on merits merely because a connected matter on the same issue is pending before the SC. Where such pendency exists, it must either keep the appeal pending until the connected case is decided or determine the merits itself. Disposing of the appeals without answering the issue either way was held improper, and the impugned order was set aside with the matter remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 655 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378211</link>
      <description>The Tribunal should not dispose of an appeal without deciding the dispute on merits merely because a connected matter on the same issue is pending before the SC. Where such pendency exists, it must either keep the appeal pending until the connected case is decided or determine the merits itself. Disposing of the appeals without answering the issue either way was held improper, and the impugned order was set aside with the matter remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>