<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 653 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378209</link>
    <description>The Punjab and Haryana High Court condoned a 248-day delay in refiling the appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appeal by the revenue challenged the order setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and remitting the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority. The case involved undervaluation of imported goods and evasion of customs duty. Following a previous judgment on a similar matter, the High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, remitting the case back for a decision on merits post the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal precedents and fair opportunities for recourse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 653 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378209</link>
      <description>The Punjab and Haryana High Court condoned a 248-day delay in refiling the appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appeal by the revenue challenged the order setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and remitting the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority. The case involved undervaluation of imported goods and evasion of customs duty. Following a previous judgment on a similar matter, the High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, remitting the case back for a decision on merits post the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal precedents and fair opportunities for recourse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>