https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378196 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the valuation of goods for captive consumption should be based on Rule 4 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, rather than Rule 8. The appellant's argument for the benefit of time bar was accepted, limiting the Department's ability to invoke the extended period of limitation. The penalty imposed was set aside by the Tribunal, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeals. en-us Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:11:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378196 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the valuation of goods for captive consumption should be based on Rule 4 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, rather than Rule 8. The appellant's argument for the benefit of time bar was accepted, limiting the Department's ability to invoke the extended period of limitation. The penalty imposed was set aside by the Tribunal, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378196