<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1793 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279909</link>
    <description>Education cess was held not leviable where the applicable double taxation avoidance agreements capped tax at the treaty rate and covered income tax and surcharge. The Tribunal treated education cess as an additional surcharge in substance and applied the treaty override principle, holding that treaty provisions prevail over the Income-tax Act to the extent of any inconsistency. As a result, cess could not be imposed over and above the agreed treaty rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:10:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1793 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279909</link>
      <description>Education cess was held not leviable where the applicable double taxation avoidance agreements capped tax at the treaty rate and covered income tax and surcharge. The Tribunal treated education cess as an additional surcharge in substance and applied the treaty override principle, holding that treaty provisions prevail over the Income-tax Act to the extent of any inconsistency. As a result, cess could not be imposed over and above the agreed treaty rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>