<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1546 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, sustaining the penalty on the undisclosed stock of jewellery but setting aside the penalty on the undisclosed investment in land and construction of the house. It upheld the validity of the penalty order and the show cause notice, confirmed the discretionary nature of the penalty under Section 271AAB, and clarified that the penalty is based on the existence of undisclosed income found during a search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:10:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1546 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, sustaining the penalty on the undisclosed stock of jewellery but setting aside the penalty on the undisclosed investment in land and construction of the house. It upheld the validity of the penalty order and the show cause notice, confirmed the discretionary nature of the penalty under Section 271AAB, and clarified that the penalty is based on the existence of undisclosed income found during a search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>