https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279902 A State Government may validly exempt land from specified planning provisions under an expediency-based notification where the opinion rests on relevant planning considerations and is neither colourable nor founded on extraneous factors; the exemption was therefore upheld. Once that exemption survived, the acquisition could not be struck down for non-compliance with the planning statute, and the Land Acquisition Act notifications were not shown to suffer from any independent defect. Absence of rehabilitation measures did not invalidate the acquisition because rehabilitation is not a statutory precondition to compulsory acquisition, and a later Land Pooling Scheme could not be applied retrospectively to completed acquisition proceedings. en-us Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Feb 2026 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279902 A State Government may validly exempt land from specified planning provisions under an expediency-based notification where the opinion rests on relevant planning considerations and is neither colourable nor founded on extraneous factors; the exemption was therefore upheld. Once that exemption survived, the acquisition could not be struck down for non-compliance with the planning statute, and the Land Acquisition Act notifications were not shown to suffer from any independent defect. Absence of rehabilitation measures did not invalidate the acquisition because rehabilitation is not a statutory precondition to compulsory acquisition, and a later Land Pooling Scheme could not be applied retrospectively to completed acquisition proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279902