<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 84 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17641</link>
    <description>The court held that the capital gains should be treated as long-term capital gains. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed, determining that the property was held by the partners from the time it was brought into the firm. The court answered the question in favor of the partners, with no costs awarded to the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:57:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 84 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17641</link>
      <description>The court held that the capital gains should be treated as long-term capital gains. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed, determining that the property was held by the partners from the time it was brought into the firm. The court answered the question in favor of the partners, with no costs awarded to the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>