<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 52 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17639</link>
    <description>The court directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer the question of the assessee&#039;s entitlement for registration under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold the registration of the firm based on the deed of partnership and the status of the Hindu undivided family was affirmed, rejecting the Department&#039;s challenge. The court emphasized the independent examination of the capital contribution and the existence of the Hindu undivided family, without expressing opinions on the case&#039;s merits to avoid bias. The application was allowed without costs, with instructions for prompt compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:54:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 52 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17639</link>
      <description>The court directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer the question of the assessee&#039;s entitlement for registration under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold the registration of the firm based on the deed of partnership and the status of the Hindu undivided family was affirmed, rejecting the Department&#039;s challenge. The court emphasized the independent examination of the capital contribution and the existence of the Hindu undivided family, without expressing opinions on the case&#039;s merits to avoid bias. The application was allowed without costs, with instructions for prompt compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>