<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Evaluates 439-Day Delay in Appeal Filing Due to Improper Advice u/s 263; Considers Justice and Diligence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45790</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay of 439 days - sufficient cause - lack of proper advice - appeal filed against assessment order before the CIT (A) within time but no Challenge of order of CIT passed u/s 263 - it was not a total lack of diligence on the part of the assessee - The sufficiency of the cause shown by the appellant is a matter to be weighed on the scales of justice</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:08:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:08:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Evaluates 439-Day Delay in Appeal Filing Due to Improper Advice u/s 263; Considers Justice and Diligence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45790</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay of 439 days - sufficient cause - lack of proper advice - appeal filed against assessment order before the CIT (A) within time but no Challenge of order of CIT passed u/s 263 - it was not a total lack of diligence on the part of the assessee - The sufficiency of the cause shown by the appellant is a matter to be weighed on the scales of justice</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:08:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>