https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378156 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was refused in a customs investigation where gold bars were found in a consignment linked to the petitioner's business, summons under Section 108 of the Customs Act were not complied with, and proceedings under Section 104 were initiated to secure his presence. The Court relied on material indicating avoidance of appearance, statements, and electronic evidence, and held that custodial interrogation was necessary. On those facts, the discretionary relief of anticipatory bail was declined. en-us Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378156 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was refused in a customs investigation where gold bars were found in a consignment linked to the petitioner's business, summons under Section 108 of the Customs Act were not complied with, and proceedings under Section 104 were initiated to secure his presence. The Court relied on material indicating avoidance of appearance, statements, and electronic evidence, and held that custodial interrogation was necessary. On those facts, the discretionary relief of anticipatory bail was declined. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378156