<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 584 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378140</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the issue for a consolidated de novo consideration, emphasizing the need for compliance with its previous directions and timely adjudication. The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority did not properly comply with its remand directions and assumed an incorrect concession by the appellant regarding classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 584 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378140</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the issue for a consolidated de novo consideration, emphasizing the need for compliance with its previous directions and timely adjudication. The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority did not properly comply with its remand directions and assumed an incorrect concession by the appellant regarding classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>