<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 368 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279869</link>
    <description>State legislation enabling recovery of loans and advances due to State-owned corporations and banks as arrears of land revenue was upheld. The Court traced competence to the State&#039;s power over administration of justice and the constitution and organisation of courts, including the ability to enlarge or reduce the jurisdiction of revenue courts. It held that the Collector, acting under the recovery machinery, exercised judicial power as a revenue court because the statute created a lis and authorised determination of rights and coercive recovery measures. The law was also sustained in pith and substance as relating to money-lending and money-lenders, with any overlap into Union fields being only incidental.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 15:05:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 368 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279869</link>
      <description>State legislation enabling recovery of loans and advances due to State-owned corporations and banks as arrears of land revenue was upheld. The Court traced competence to the State&#039;s power over administration of justice and the constitution and organisation of courts, including the ability to enlarge or reduce the jurisdiction of revenue courts. It held that the Collector, acting under the recovery machinery, exercised judicial power as a revenue court because the statute created a lis and authorised determination of rights and coercive recovery measures. The law was also sustained in pith and substance as relating to money-lending and money-lenders, with any overlap into Union fields being only incidental.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>