<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 571 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378127</link>
    <description>The court quashed the warrant of authorization and all consequential actions, ruling that the conditions for issuing the warrant under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were not met. The court emphasized the need for tangible information and valid jurisdiction for such actions, ensuring that powers under Section 132 are not misused. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 571 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378127</link>
      <description>The court quashed the warrant of authorization and all consequential actions, ruling that the conditions for issuing the warrant under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were not met. The court emphasized the need for tangible information and valid jurisdiction for such actions, ensuring that powers under Section 132 are not misused. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>