<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 560 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378116</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 120,65,600/- regarding the bonus paid to a shareholder under Section 36(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the bonus was paid for services rendered and not in lieu of dividends, thus justifying the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 06:43:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 560 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378116</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 120,65,600/- regarding the bonus paid to a shareholder under Section 36(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the bonus was paid for services rendered and not in lieu of dividends, thus justifying the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>