<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 79 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17613</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition as there were no referable questions, affirming the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. The petitioner&#039;s failure to provide essential details and evidence led to the denial of benefits under sections 80J and 80HH of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with Supreme Court precedent, emphasizing the need for specific conditions to claim deductions. The court directed the judgment copy to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, for further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:10:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 79 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17613</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition as there were no referable questions, affirming the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. The petitioner&#039;s failure to provide essential details and evidence led to the denial of benefits under sections 80J and 80HH of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with Supreme Court precedent, emphasizing the need for specific conditions to claim deductions. The court directed the judgment copy to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, for further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>