<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 532 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378088</link>
    <description>Quasi-judicial excise adjudication under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act must proceed within the statutory framework and, as far as possible, within a reasonable time. Keeping show cause notices dormant in the call book for years without a legally sustainable basis, then reviving them after an inordinate delay, is unlawful where the delay is caused by extraneous considerations and prejudices the assessee. The absence of notice about call book transfer and the resulting loss of material and witnesses reinforced the prejudice. The delayed revival of the notices was therefore held arbitrary and the proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 06:30:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 532 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378088</link>
      <description>Quasi-judicial excise adjudication under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act must proceed within the statutory framework and, as far as possible, within a reasonable time. Keeping show cause notices dormant in the call book for years without a legally sustainable basis, then reviving them after an inordinate delay, is unlawful where the delay is caused by extraneous considerations and prejudices the assessee. The absence of notice about call book transfer and the resulting loss of material and witnesses reinforced the prejudice. The delayed revival of the notices was therefore held arbitrary and the proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>