https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378086 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order demanding Central Excise duty against the appellant. The Tribunal found the demand to be unsupported by concrete evidence of manufacturing activities, refuting allegations of clandestine manufacturing and clearance of goods. Previous findings and lack of substantial evidence led to the rejection of the demand, emphasizing the insufficiency of documents provided by the appellant. Legal precedents requiring corroborative evidence for such demands were deemed applicable, resulting in the appellant's favor with consequential relief granted. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Apr 2019 16:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378086 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order demanding Central Excise duty against the appellant. The Tribunal found the demand to be unsupported by concrete evidence of manufacturing activities, refuting allegations of clandestine manufacturing and clearance of goods. Previous findings and lack of substantial evidence led to the rejection of the demand, emphasizing the insufficiency of documents provided by the appellant. Legal precedents requiring corroborative evidence for such demands were deemed applicable, resulting in the appellant's favor with consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378086