<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1446 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279856</link>
    <description>The court upheld the penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs imposed on the appellant under Section 114 of the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s actions, including lending his CHA license without proper verification and failing to exercise due diligence, facilitated the smuggling attempt, justifying the penalty. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to customs regulations and the serious consequences of negligence in this context.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 05:48:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1446 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279856</link>
      <description>The court upheld the penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs imposed on the appellant under Section 114 of the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s actions, including lending his CHA license without proper verification and failing to exercise due diligence, facilitated the smuggling attempt, justifying the penalty. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to customs regulations and the serious consequences of negligence in this context.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>