<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1427 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279855</link>
    <description>A co-operative credit society&#039;s income from loans advanced through Class B or associate members remained eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i), because associate membership recognised under the governing co-operative law was not defeated merely by the absence of voting rights or management participation. Section 80P(4) also did not apply, as the society was found not to be a co-operative bank within the meaning of the Income-tax Act and Banking Regulation Act; it functioned as a member-based credit society, not a bank accepting public deposits as its principal business. The Revenue&#039;s objection to the deduction was therefore rejected and the assessee&#039;s entitlement was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 05:48:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1427 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279855</link>
      <description>A co-operative credit society&#039;s income from loans advanced through Class B or associate members remained eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i), because associate membership recognised under the governing co-operative law was not defeated merely by the absence of voting rights or management participation. Section 80P(4) also did not apply, as the society was found not to be a co-operative bank within the meaning of the Income-tax Act and Banking Regulation Act; it functioned as a member-based credit society, not a bank accepting public deposits as its principal business. The Revenue&#039;s objection to the deduction was therefore rejected and the assessee&#039;s entitlement was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>