<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 513 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Assessee, canceling the penalty order of Rs. 1,05,973 under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the failure of the penalty notice to specify the nature of the charge clearly, in line with legal precedents and judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:33:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 513 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Assessee, canceling the penalty order of Rs. 1,05,973 under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the failure of the penalty notice to specify the nature of the charge clearly, in line with legal precedents and judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>