<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 77 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17605</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that Mandi tax payment was correctly classified as a fee, not a tax, for the assessment year 1985-86. As a fee, it did not fall under the provisions of section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the decision to allow the claim of the respondent-assessee, resulting in the deletion of the disallowed amount of Rs. 1,12,269. The ruling favored the assessee, with all raised questions by the Revenue being decided against them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:52:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 77 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17605</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that Mandi tax payment was correctly classified as a fee, not a tax, for the assessment year 1985-86. As a fee, it did not fall under the provisions of section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the decision to allow the claim of the respondent-assessee, resulting in the deletion of the disallowed amount of Rs. 1,12,269. The ruling favored the assessee, with all raised questions by the Revenue being decided against them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>