<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 495 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378051</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted where the prosecution sought to club foreign currency recovered from the petitioner with currency allegedly recovered in a separate earlier case against his son. The Court noted that the petitioner was not an accused in the case against his son, and the son was not an accused in the present case. On that basis, it treated the clubbing of recoveries as a debatable issue requiring examination at trial, rather than a basis to deny bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:32:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 495 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378051</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted where the prosecution sought to club foreign currency recovered from the petitioner with currency allegedly recovered in a separate earlier case against his son. The Court noted that the petitioner was not an accused in the case against his son, and the son was not an accused in the present case. On that basis, it treated the clubbing of recoveries as a debatable issue requiring examination at trial, rather than a basis to deny bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>