<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 493 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378049</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake, ruling that the extended limitation period was not applicable. The reclassification of goods without misdeclaration led to the rejection of penalties and confiscation, except for one bill of entry. The decision was pronounced on 21.02.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:32:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 493 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378049</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake, ruling that the extended limitation period was not applicable. The reclassification of goods without misdeclaration led to the rejection of penalties and confiscation, except for one bill of entry. The decision was pronounced on 21.02.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>