<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 492 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378048</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal held that the limitation period specified in the notification for claiming a refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid at the time of import should apply. The tribunal set aside the decision of the first appellate authority, ruling in favor of the revenue. The importance of adhering to the specified limitation period for refund claims under relevant notifications was emphasized, overturning the initial ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:32:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 492 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378048</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal held that the limitation period specified in the notification for claiming a refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid at the time of import should apply. The tribunal set aside the decision of the first appellate authority, ruling in favor of the revenue. The importance of adhering to the specified limitation period for refund claims under relevant notifications was emphasized, overturning the initial ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>