https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378047 The bench partially allowed the rectification application, correcting a typographical error in the Final Order that incorrectly mentioned putrefiable organic matter instead of non-fibrous material in the consignment. The corrected version clarified that the consignment contained 2.71% non-fibrous material within permissible limits. However, the original decision on confiscation and penalties was upheld based on the presence of non-fibrous material, justifying the actions taken by the Tribunal. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:32:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378047 The bench partially allowed the rectification application, correcting a typographical error in the Final Order that incorrectly mentioned putrefiable organic matter instead of non-fibrous material in the consignment. The corrected version clarified that the consignment contained 2.71% non-fibrous material within permissible limits. However, the original decision on confiscation and penalties was upheld based on the presence of non-fibrous material, justifying the actions taken by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378047