https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17603 Subsequent events can be considered in writ proceedings, and where they show that relief would be futile or inequitable, the Court may decline discretionary writ jurisdiction. The writ petition challenged a compulsory purchase order under Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, but during its pendency the property was auctioned and the highest bid was substantially above the agreed sale price. The Court found that the draft development plan did not materially undermine the auction price and treated the later auction as decisive in assessing relief. On that basis, it refused to entertain the petition for effective relief. en-us Thu, 09 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:42:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17603 Subsequent events can be considered in writ proceedings, and where they show that relief would be futile or inequitable, the Court may decline discretionary writ jurisdiction. The writ petition challenged a compulsory purchase order under Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, but during its pendency the property was auctioned and the highest bid was substantially above the agreed sale price. The Court found that the draft development plan did not materially undermine the auction price and treated the later auction as decisive in assessing relief. On that basis, it refused to entertain the petition for effective relief. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 09 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17603