<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 490 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378046</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order demanding customs and central excise duties, confiscation of goods, and imposition of penalties. The tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence of fraud or collusion and highlighted the authorities&#039; awareness of the appellant&#039;s situation before permitting the conversion to the EPCG Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 490 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378046</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order demanding customs and central excise duties, confiscation of goods, and imposition of penalties. The tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence of fraud or collusion and highlighted the authorities&#039; awareness of the appellant&#039;s situation before permitting the conversion to the EPCG Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>