<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 487 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378043</link>
    <description>The NCLT dismissed the company petition, citing the absence of continuous acts of oppression or mismanagement. However, the Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by annulling the allotment of 90,000 shares to the 2nd respondent for non-compliance with Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013. Other claims by the appellant were denied, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 487 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378043</link>
      <description>The NCLT dismissed the company petition, citing the absence of continuous acts of oppression or mismanagement. However, the Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by annulling the allotment of 90,000 shares to the 2nd respondent for non-compliance with Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013. Other claims by the appellant were denied, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>