<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 463 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378019</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the matter back to the Single Judge for fresh consideration and disposal, as the dismissal of the writ petition was based on a judgment related to a different section of the KGST Act. Consequently, the writ appeal was allowed, the impugned judgment was set aside, and the writ petition was restored for reconsideration by the Single Judge. The Registry was instructed to post the writ petition before the appropriate Single Judge for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 463 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378019</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the matter back to the Single Judge for fresh consideration and disposal, as the dismissal of the writ petition was based on a judgment related to a different section of the KGST Act. Consequently, the writ appeal was allowed, the impugned judgment was set aside, and the writ petition was restored for reconsideration by the Single Judge. The Registry was instructed to post the writ petition before the appropriate Single Judge for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>