<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 462 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378018</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, determining that the proposed arbitral proceedings constitute an international commercial arbitration because the applicant habitually resides in Dubai. Therefore, applications should be made to the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court of India, as per Section 11(12)(a) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:28:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 462 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378018</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, determining that the proposed arbitral proceedings constitute an international commercial arbitration because the applicant habitually resides in Dubai. Therefore, applications should be made to the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court of India, as per Section 11(12)(a) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>