<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17599</link>
    <description>The court granted relief under section 80J for the seed processing unit, remitted the issue of relief for the cattle feed unit back to the Tribunal for reconsideration due to insufficient evidence, and directed verification of machinery&#039;s exposure to corrosive chemicals for higher depreciation and development rebate in the context of sugar manufacturing activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17599</link>
      <description>The court granted relief under section 80J for the seed processing unit, remitted the issue of relief for the cattle feed unit back to the Tribunal for reconsideration due to insufficient evidence, and directed verification of machinery&#039;s exposure to corrosive chemicals for higher depreciation and development rebate in the context of sugar manufacturing activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>