<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1869 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order confirming the demand and penalties. The Tribunal found the Show Cause Notice lacked specific allegations of undervaluation based on Cost Accounting Standards-4 (CAS-4), deeming it vague and not maintainable. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the law due to this deficiency in the Notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1869 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order confirming the demand and penalties. The Tribunal found the Show Cause Notice lacked specific allegations of undervaluation based on Cost Accounting Standards-4 (CAS-4), deeming it vague and not maintainable. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the law due to this deficiency in the Notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>