https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279816 In oppression and mismanagement proceedings, stale grievances were held time-barred where they related to acts more than three years before filing, applying the Limitation Act, 1963 and the residuary period under Article 113. Allegations of continuing conduct, including non-circulation of balance sheets and failure to hold annual general meetings during 2013 to 2015, were treated as within time and remained justiciable. The appellants were also found to have locus standi as shareholders, since uncontroverted annual return records supported their shareholding and disproved the contrary finding. The dismissal was set aside for grievances from 2013 onwards and the matter remitted on that confined period. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:39:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279816 In oppression and mismanagement proceedings, stale grievances were held time-barred where they related to acts more than three years before filing, applying the Limitation Act, 1963 and the residuary period under Article 113. Allegations of continuing conduct, including non-circulation of balance sheets and failure to hold annual general meetings during 2013 to 2015, were treated as within time and remained justiciable. The appellants were also found to have locus standi as shareholders, since uncontroverted annual return records supported their shareholding and disproved the contrary finding. The dismissal was set aside for grievances from 2013 onwards and the matter remitted on that confined period. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279816