https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279832 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the original order, emphasizing that the availability of a statutory alternative remedy does not always bar a writ petition if there is a breach of natural justice. The court found that the failure to consider a relevant tribunal decision constituted a breach of natural justice, leading to setting aside the impugned order. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, instructing the authority to consider the relevant tribunal decision. The court clarified that the authority could reach the same conclusion if warranted by the facts. The writ petition was disposed of without costs. en-us Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:39:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279832 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the original order, emphasizing that the availability of a statutory alternative remedy does not always bar a writ petition if there is a breach of natural justice. The court found that the failure to consider a relevant tribunal decision constituted a breach of natural justice, leading to setting aside the impugned order. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, instructing the authority to consider the relevant tribunal decision. The court clarified that the authority could reach the same conclusion if warranted by the facts. The writ petition was disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279832