https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279812 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the assessment order, and directed the respondent to reconsider the matter, providing a personal hearing to the petitioner and allowing document submission. It found lack of compliance with mandatory procedure and violation of natural justice in the impugned order, emphasizing the importance of a substantive opportunity for a hearing under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act. The court ordered a fresh assessment within one month from the judgment's receipt. en-us Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 12:53:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279812 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the assessment order, and directed the respondent to reconsider the matter, providing a personal hearing to the petitioner and allowing document submission. It found lack of compliance with mandatory procedure and violation of natural justice in the impugned order, emphasizing the importance of a substantive opportunity for a hearing under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act. The court ordered a fresh assessment within one month from the judgment's receipt. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279812