<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 41 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17591</link>
    <description>Revenue entries and khasra girdawri were held insufficient to prove title or partition of a Hindu undivided family property, so the property standing in the deceased&#039;s name was treated as separate property and estate duty applied to it. The challenge based on lack of individual notice also failed because the petitioner did not participate in the statutory proceedings or file the required return, and could not reopen concluded factual issues through writ jurisdiction after valid assessments and appeals against his brothers. Any dispute about contribution between siblings was a separate inter se matter, not a basis to invalidate the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:19:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 41 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17591</link>
      <description>Revenue entries and khasra girdawri were held insufficient to prove title or partition of a Hindu undivided family property, so the property standing in the deceased&#039;s name was treated as separate property and estate duty applied to it. The challenge based on lack of individual notice also failed because the petitioner did not participate in the statutory proceedings or file the required return, and could not reopen concluded factual issues through writ jurisdiction after valid assessments and appeals against his brothers. Any dispute about contribution between siblings was a separate inter se matter, not a basis to invalidate the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>