https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378014 The Supreme Court held that where the High Court decides a writ petition without considering the binding precedent governing maintainability, the proper course is to set aside the order and remit the matter for fresh adjudication. The dispute concerned maintainability of an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 in the setting of an unregistered partnership and the bar under Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act. Because the relevant precedent had not been applied, the Court declined to decide the merits for the first time in appeal and sent the matter back for reconsideration in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378014 The Supreme Court held that where the High Court decides a writ petition without considering the binding precedent governing maintainability, the proper course is to set aside the order and remit the matter for fresh adjudication. The dispute concerned maintainability of an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 in the setting of an unregistered partnership and the bar under Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act. Because the relevant precedent had not been applied, the Court declined to decide the merits for the first time in appeal and sent the matter back for reconsideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378014