<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 447 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378003</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, affirming the confiscation of gold bangles and penalties imposed under the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant&#039;s argument that the bangles were taken out of India, not smuggled in, was dismissed for lack of evidence. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, finding no merit in the request for disciplinary action against investigating officers, emphasizing the fulfillment of their duties in catching the smuggling attempt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 447 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378003</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, affirming the confiscation of gold bangles and penalties imposed under the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant&#039;s argument that the bangles were taken out of India, not smuggled in, was dismissed for lack of evidence. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, finding no merit in the request for disciplinary action against investigating officers, emphasizing the fulfillment of their duties in catching the smuggling attempt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>