<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 430 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377986</link>
    <description>The judgment set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and emphasizing the need for a nexus between input services and the manufacture of final products. It clarified the recovery process under Rule 14 and the roles of ISDs and recipients of ISD invoices in CENVAT credit matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 06:58:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 430 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377986</link>
      <description>The judgment set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and emphasizing the need for a nexus between input services and the manufacture of final products. It clarified the recovery process under Rule 14 and the roles of ISDs and recipients of ISD invoices in CENVAT credit matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>