https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377985 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a glass bottle manufacturer, regarding the dispute over CENVAT credit entitlement on various items. The disputed items were deemed to qualify as inputs under the revised definition effective from April 1, 2011, entitling the appellant to the credit. Additionally, the appellant was found eligible for CENVAT credit on items related to manufacturing final products, despite the department's argument against it. The Tribunal remitted the issue of alleged excess credit back for verification, potentially granting the appellant entitled credit upon verification of additional invoices. en-us Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 06:58:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377985 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a glass bottle manufacturer, regarding the dispute over CENVAT credit entitlement on various items. The disputed items were deemed to qualify as inputs under the revised definition effective from April 1, 2011, entitling the appellant to the credit. Additionally, the appellant was found eligible for CENVAT credit on items related to manufacturing final products, despite the department's argument against it. The Tribunal remitted the issue of alleged excess credit back for verification, potentially granting the appellant entitled credit upon verification of additional invoices. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377985