<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 416 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377972</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, primarily on the ground of the jurisdictional issue. It held that the assessment order was invalid due to the AO&#039;s failure to obtain the necessary approval for expanding the scope of scrutiny beyond the issues identified under CASS. Consequently, the other grounds of appeal became academic and were not adjudicated separately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 06:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 416 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377972</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, primarily on the ground of the jurisdictional issue. It held that the assessment order was invalid due to the AO&#039;s failure to obtain the necessary approval for expanding the scope of scrutiny beyond the issues identified under CASS. Consequently, the other grounds of appeal became academic and were not adjudicated separately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>